Fake court document signed by judge = Felony

Click on the link to see the entire fake court document.

Title 26 USC § 7206(1)

Fraud and false statements

 

http://carolinacrimereport.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/fakemotiontocontinue.jpg

 

Any Person who… (1) Declaration under penalties of perjury – Willfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter; shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof;

  • Shall be imprisoned not more than 3 years
  • Or fined not more than $250,000 for individuals ($500,000 for corporations)
  • Or both, together with cost of prosecution

Above, is a photo of an unlawful court document which contains a signature of Wake County Court’s Judge Ruth.

READ THE FULL COMPLAINT HERE:

http://carolinacrimereport.com/motion-to-add-defendant-wake-judge-kristin-ruth/

If this is Judge Ruth’s signature, she signed an unlawful court document which results in obstruction of justice. If someone else signed her name, this is forgery, and it still resulted in an obstruction of justice. And fake court documents are a violation of federal statute Title 18, 371. The penalty for using a fake court document is up to five years in jail.

  • The fake “Motion to Continue” document also violates Title 18, §514, fictitious obligation, whereby it is a crime to use a fraudulent document.

 If she applied “reasonable diligence,” per Title 42, a federal statute, she would have known that official court documents have an “AOC” (Administrative Office of the Courts) code in the lower left corner. There is no AOC code in the lower left corner. She should have immediately recognized that. Instead she signed an unlawful court document. There is no lawful “Motion to Continue” document approved by the Administrative Office of the Courts. She should have known that the only legal court documents are posted online at www.nccourts.org/forms. In addition, it is the duty of the DA and superior court clerk to inform witnesses about court dates, not an attorney for a defendant. And, it’s even more ludicrousthat “the moving attorney shall notify all witnesses except the charging officer.” The charging officer is the one person who needs to know most about a court date. And it’s the duty of the court clerk and DA to notify the witnesses for the state, not an attorney for the defendant.    Fake court documents land people in jail:  http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-03-14/news/fl-forged-jail-records-20110314_1_fake-documents-deputy-clerk-tavaris-herndon